Re: Fedora 13 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting: 2010-03-04 @ 01:00 UTC Recap

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Laska wrote:
> Quality isn't something you staff and hope they cover all your testing
> needs.  Quality practices are expected of everyone at all stages of the
> process.  In the QA team, we work to provide a framework and guidelines
> so people interested in making a difference have an opportunity to
> succeed.  I can tell you are passionate about KDE.  I hope we can find a
> way to convert this energy into something actionable that will provide
> more insight into how the release criteria apply to KDE.

How much "insight" do you need to figure out that if the updater doesn't 
start at all because of unresolved symbols, that's not any more acceptable 
for KDE than it is for GNOME or any other desktop?

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux