On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Thomas Janssen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 4, 2010 at 3:30 PM, Juha Tuomala <Juha.Tuomala@xxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > >> current stable release nor support an official backports repo, an unofficial > >> one will no doubt spring up, or an existing unofficial repo will pick up > >> that role (for KDE, kde-redhat stable would probably be revived, currently > >> it's mostly empty for Fedora as the kind of stuff which would be in there is > >> usually just pushed as official Fedora updates). > > > > Go ahead, make that to your kde-hardcore-followers-repo. In my > > understanding, that's what it has been for past years already > > anyway. > > There's no need to continued attack the KDE SIG. You're not a first > time linuxer. If you're that scared as you said in your OP, then you > should use yum to exclude that stuff. If you dont know how: man yum ; > man yum.conf > > But of course, you couldn't then bash others. > Alternatively, the KDE SIG could stop ignoring the problems that were caused this week by the updates they released. Even an "I'm sorry I broke your desktop" would go a long way. The update the busted my desktop happened on a pretty vanilla install, I suspect lots of users experienced issues. -Mike -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
