On Thursday 04 March 2010 15:01:29 Juha Tuomala wrote: > On Thu, 4 Mar 2010, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > You mean the KDE stability proposal? As this is F11, i.e. "previous > > stable", KDE 4.4 would actually not have been pushed to F11 under that > > proposal. > > How i read it, you would still push *one* feature release in the > middle of stable release lifespan, right? > > How that's going to solve anything as upstream *intentionally* pushes > stuff into it to break things? Even they don't expect you to do what > you do. People who wants stability would be in time of this push to Fn still running Fn-1. Only people who wants new features would be running Fn. There's no sense to have two frozen releases out there! We can just support one for 12 months... I personally think that update every 6 months breaks much more stuff so letting users to stays as much time with older but still supported releases is what we really want. > > Tuju > > -- > Ajatteleva ihminen tarvitsee unta. -- Jaroslav Řezník <jreznik@xxxxxxxxxx> Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno Office: +420 532 294 275 Mobile: +420 731 455 332 Red Hat, Inc. http://cz.redhat.com/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
