On 3 March 2010 13:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/03/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Masters wrote: >> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 21:07 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >>> >>> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: >>>> Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but >>>> here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these >>>> functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update >>>> going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does >>>> anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11? >> >> My own personal opinion is that stable updates should only fix serious >> issues, or security problems. Fedora has such a short lifetime as it is, >> I really can't see the value in pushing features to F11 when it will die >> soon. I think it's far better to leave the churn in rawhide. > Let F11 rott because it's EOL soon? > No. Bugfixes (serious ones) and security fixes would not allow it to happen till the time it is EOL. -- Rakesh Pandit https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Rakesh freedom, friends, features, first -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
