On 03/03/2010 09:03 AM, Jon Masters wrote: > On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 21:07 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: >> >> On Tue, 2 Mar 2010, Jesse Keating wrote: >>> Ok... removing deprecated uses is a questionable at best update, but >>> here is the kicker. The perl in F11 is perl-5.10.0-82.fc11. So these >>> functions aren't actually deprecated in F11. So... why is this update >>> going out? What possible benefit does the user get from this? Does >>> anybody see this as a reasonable update to publish on F11? > > My own personal opinion is that stable updates should only fix serious > issues, or security problems. Fedora has such a short lifetime as it is, > I really can't see the value in pushing features to F11 when it will die > soon. I think it's far better to leave the churn in rawhide. Let F11 rott because it's EOL soon? Pardon, but you can't be serious about this. At least I am trying to provide all released Fedoras with same amount of attention. Anybody still wonders about Fedora's poor shape and it's reputation? Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
