Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/02/2010 06:06 PM, Björn Persson wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 01:34 +0100, Björn Persson wrote:
>>> Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>>> Even bugfix releases of KDE require a session restart to fully work.
>>>
>>> I consider that a serious design flaw in KDE and a strong argument
>>> against releasing any KDE updates to stable releases other than fixes
>>> for serious bugs. The only practical way to keep up with the Fedora
>>> update firehose is to update every day and let the update run in the
>>> background while I'm working. If I put it off until I'm about to turn
>>> the computer off, then the updates will accumulate and updating will
>>> take a long time when I finally do it. I might not have the time to sit
>>> around and wait for the update to finish so that I can turn the computer
>>> off, so I'll put it off again, and when the next opportunity comes the
>>> list of updates will have grown even more. That's a vicious circle I
>>> don't want to get into.
>>
>> We do need a "apply all updates and shut down" option.
>
> That doesn't help much if I'm going to pack the laptop up in a bag and take it
> with me. I'll still have to sit there and twiddle my thumbs while it updates.

I wonder if something like the windows download updates and inform me 
when you've downloaded them crossed with the pre-upgrade type system 
could solve your use case.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux