On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 05:19:03PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 02:11 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: >> On the other hand, your usecase has a solution, it's called CentOS. >> > >Wrong answer. Fedora can provide rapid adoption of new technology in >it's 6 month release cycle. It can provide stability for those releases >with a more conservative update style, focusing more on bugfixes and >less on new features/packages. We can give users the confidence that >when they install a Fedora release, we won't screw it up with >irresponsible updates, or by changing the look/feel of their system >midstream. We can do all of this at the rapid pace that puts Fedora in >a vastly different world than CentOS or even Ubuntu. This is the kind >of operating system I wish to produce, and I wish to consume. So again, I personally agree. I would love to work on a distro like that again. We used to be pretty close to this, and over time I think Fedora has drifted away from that into something entirely different. josh -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
