Doug Ledford wrote: > Split off from the stable pushes in Bodhi thread just because I'd like > to see it not get lost. (For your information, you didn't split it off. Your message is marked as a reply to the one by "Mail Lists" and is displayed in my Kmail as part of Kevin's enormous thread.) > One could argue that the current bodhi karma system is simply too > simplistic for real use cases. Maybe instead of just +1 -1, there > should be: > > Fixes my problem > Works for me (someone testing that didn't necessarily have any of the > problem supposedly fixed by this update just noting that their system > still works ok with the update) > Doesn't fix my problem (but doesn't necessarily imply it's any worse > than before) > Causes new problems (which should, IMO, be an automatic veto of any push > to stable, requiring intervention to override) That sounds really good, although I would call the second one "still works for me" to emphasize that it's for people for whom the previous release also worked. Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
