Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 22:45:12 +0100
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Sat, 27 Feb 2010 13:17:43 -0800, Adam wrote:
> 
> > On Sat, 2010-02-27 at 20:18 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> > 
> > > Three times "Could". Let's talk about it when you know something
> > > definite, please, but before it will become another hurdle.
> > 
> > That's ironic - given that that's exactly what the people defending
> > this proposal wanted to do, while it's someone who's opposed to the
> > proposal who decided to start a premature argument about it.
> 
> Then let's see this thread as the updates-testing push of a proposal
> FESCo might have given its blessing to, if this thread had not been
> started.

Except it's more like a scratch build that someone built quickly, then
decided that a more detailed approach was needed, so they didn't even
submit an update. ;) 

kevin

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux