On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 12:14:41 -0500, Bill wrote: > tested. Every fix carries a risk of regression. > > To phrase a strawman differently: > > "No update is pushed to users without verification and testing from entities > other than the packager." No, thanks. The "popular"/"high profile" packages will get their usual rushed +1 votes in bodhi (from people who even download from koji without waiting for an entire package set to be published in a repo - from people who regularly vote +1 even when something is clearly broken). And less-popular packages will suffer. > Consider it a second eye. If there is a volunteer tester, who also takes responsibility when not noticing regression caused by an update, fine. If there is no volunteer, who will lend the update submitter a second eye? Either there are resources or there aren't. > Consider it a form of code review. Fedora Legacy, aka the barrel burst. More mandatory stuff, not enough free resources => failure. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
