On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 01:12:53PM -0500, James Antill wrote: > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:14 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > > On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:29:31PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > > > > New: > > > yum --releasever=<next> upgrade > > > > > > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or worse? > > > > Is the releasever option a yum F13 feature? On F12 it complains that > > it is not a valid option. > > > > Also repoquery returns F12 results but accepts --releasever: > > $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --repoid=fedora kernel > > kernel-0:2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64 > > Yes, it's a 3.2.26+ feature. It's likely that F12 will get a yum update > eventually ... and you can get a 3.2.26+ yum from rawhide now. So for > ideas about changing how rawhide works, that's not a big requirement is > it? Yes, it is not a big requirement. Nevertheless I can wonder why it does not work in repoquery, even though it is in the --help output. So if it is expected not to work, it is imho a bug in repoquery to say that it supports it. Regards Till
Attachment:
pgp8IeF1lNW6L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
