Re: fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 17:14 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2010 at 04:29:31PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> 
> >  New:
> >   yum --releasever=<next> upgrade
> > 
> > Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or worse?
> 
> Is the releasever option a yum F13 feature? On F12 it complains that
> it is not a valid option.
> 
> Also repoquery returns F12 results but accepts --releasever:
> $ repoquery --releasever=rawhide --repoid=fedora kernel
> kernel-0:2.6.31.5-127.fc12.x86_64

 Yes, it's a 3.2.26+ feature. It's likely that F12 will get a yum update
eventually ... and you can get a 3.2.26+ yum from rawhide now. So for
ideas about changing how rawhide works, that's not a big requirement is
it?

-- 
James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.27
http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux