Re: fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Thu, 25 Feb 2010, Bill Nottingham wrote:

> Seth Vidal (skvidal@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx) said:
>>> Proposal: don't ship fedora-release-rawhide at all. To move between
>>> streams, run "yum --releasever <whatever> install/upgrade fedora-release"
>>>
>>>  yum --releasever=<next> upgrade
>>>
>>> Am I missing something? Do people think this would be better, or worse?
>>
>> gpg signatures.
>>
>> changing the releasever points to a different set of repos and,
>> potentially, different (or no) sigs.
>>
>> how will that work?
>
> By going to repo-wide keys!
>
> (Yes, I realize that doesn't actually 'solve' the scenario you mention.)
>

I am not suggesting this but:

yum --nogpgcheck --releasever=something update fedora-release

might work

-sv

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux