Re: Call for Participation - Fedora 13 Talking Points

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:06:09PM -0500, Jens Petersen wrote:
> Perhaps I missed it but I didn't see any clear indication that
> a Talking Point has to be a Feature.  Is that the case?

It doesn't.  A Talking Point should be clearly advantageous to the
latest release or somehow contemporaneous with the release.  For
example, the public debut of the Fedora Community portal, which was
not technically a feature of Fedora 11, was still a Talking Point.

Since the TPs will be used quite a bit in formulating release-specific
marketing material, they'll naturally favor features.  But there
should be room for one or two non-feature related, important things
going on around the release.

-- 
Paul W. Frields                                http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
  http://redhat.com/   -  -  -  -   http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/
          Where open source multiplies: http://opensource.com
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux