On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 10:38 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > If you need/use it and want to maintain it, you are free to do so. If > the kernel team knows a better alternative that you should consider, > then the package should be retired instead of just orphaned and an > explanation about why it was retired should be added to a dead.package > file in the CVS devel branch. Usually the latter is not done, so you can > only ask the previous maintainers. Nevertheless, having a "copy that's > maintained there" sounds like bad packaging practice. > > Regards > Till Maybe it was retired or orphaned because unifdef was superseded by sunifdef (which is packaged in fedora), which is now superseded by coan [1] (which is not yet packaged in fedora)? Krzesimir [1] http://coan2.sourceforge.net/ -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
