Matt Domsch wrote: > However, check if unifdef is really needed. The kernel team knew it > was going to be orphaned, and said "that's OK, as the kernel tree has > its own copy that's maintained there." or somesuch. If not, letting > it stay dead is fine - desireable in fact. > What is the criteria for whether a Fedora package is "really needed" and for which staying dead is "desirable"? I picked it up because I use it myself; I had no idea that it had anything whatsoever to do with the "kernel team", and I don't have any use for a "copy that's maintained there". Thanks, Eric -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel