Re: documentation on Bugzilla bug lifecycle/developer procedures?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Matt Domsch wrote:
> However, check if unifdef is really needed.  The kernel team knew it
> was going to be orphaned, and said "that's OK, as the kernel tree has
> its own copy that's maintained there." or somesuch.  If not, letting
> it stay dead is fine - desireable in fact.
>   
What is the criteria for whether a Fedora package is "really needed" and 
for which staying dead is "desirable"?  I picked it up because I use it 
myself; I had no idea that it had anything whatsoever to do with the 
"kernel team", and I don't have any use for a "copy that's maintained 
there".

Thanks,
Eric

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux