On Mon, Jun 14, 2004 at 10:33:35AM -0400, David T Hollis wrote: > > Patches always welcome :) > > Would this type of thing be avoidable if the gcc34 packages where to > have "Provides: gcc 3.4.0" or similar or would that have dorked all > kinds of other stuff up? Just looking for ways to properly avoid this > kind of problem/non-problem for future cases. Not using any of the manual requirements would be IMHO the right thing here. The packages don't really need libgcj34, they need libgcj.so.5 and rpm creates those requirements automatically. libgcj 3.3.x provides libgcj.so.4 instead. Similarly with libstdc++. Jakub
