On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ivan Gyurdiev wrote: > > Removed package gcc34 > > Not Cool. Maybe --provide those in gcc? My understanding is that all the packages with the *gc?34 dependencies are going to need fixing anyways, so providing these deps from gcc is not enough. The broken deps are good flags to remind us that the rebuilds are needed. Patches always welcome :) -- Elliot The daring is in the doing http://people.redhat.com/sopwith/
