On 28 January 2010 01:16, Matthew Saltzman <mjs@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 01:47 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 23:08 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> > 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>: >> > > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of >> > > those kinds of tools that "just works" and so people stick with it. >> > >> > Well.. perhaps. OTOH people seem to have happily migrated from xpdf to >> > evince over time (or at least that's my perception). >> >> What do you mean? >> >> # yum -y install xpdf >> (clip) >> ---> Package xpdf.x86_64 1:3.02-15.fc12 set to be updated >> >> xpdf is still there, so actually nothing brutal has yet happened in the >> case of xpdf. When xpdf *is* removed I'd expect cries of rage. > > Indeed, there are several features of xpdf that evince doesn't yet > support. Until it does, it turns out to be useless with emacs-auctex, > for one thing. > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451210 Well, evince may actually be useable from the auctex perspective at this point. Also, auctex upstream has a new backend for dealing with file viewing which will also make it easier to integrate with xdg-open/evince/okular -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
