On 01/27/2010 12:45 PM, Jussi Lehtola wrote: > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 18:04 +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote: >> However, it's not clear to me if okular and evince-dvi provide >> equivalent functionality that we're yet in a position to drop xdvik. >> Comments? If you use xdvik because other viewers don't give some >> particular functionality, it would be helpful if you stated what that >> functionality is. > > As a heavy LaTeX user I would be really against dropping xdvi before > there is some other app that runs as fast. Evince very slow - xdvi shows > pages straight away, whereas evince often displays "Loading..." I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of those kinds of tools that "just works" and so people stick with it. -- Orion Poplawski Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222 NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702 3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
