>>>>> "BN" == Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx> writes: BN> There is a new internal process that encourages that packages have BN> existing Fedora reviews. Please define "internal". If this is some Red Hat internal thing, don't you think the community who is being asked to do this work should at least be informed? BN> They're reviews of Fedora packages. Fedora doesn't have any policy which requires reviews of these packages. Fedora doesn't have the manpower to do re-reviews of packages at this time. BN> If the queue's not being processed quickly, the queue won't be BN> processed quickly. And you don't see any negative effects from this? Really? What about people with submissions just sitting around? BN> If these reviews need quick attention, then I suspect resources will BN> need to be assigned to them. Assigned by whom? Again, if this is a Red Hat internal thing, please handle it within Red Hat or please at least talk to the community about it. BN> I'm not convinced that adding 12 packages to the queue (the current BN> count of these) is anything to worry about, given that we get more BN> new submissions than that per week already without any other BN> controls. Because we get a lot of submissions we're buried under, throwing a bunch of pointless ones on top won't hurt? Come on, at least get someone to talk to us about this. - J< -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
