On Tue, 26 Jan 2010, Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> Note that rpm < 4.6.0 did behave differently here: packages with >> conflicting files were allowed to be installed in the same transaction but >> not if installed separately, leading to strange situations. So if there's >> a chance you've tested on RHEL/Centos at some point, that could explain it >> as it'd then be just a matter of which order the packages got installed >> in. > > That could well explain why we've only seen this reported on EPEL 5. > I thought it was a coincidence, but looks like it could be the older > RPM version there. Okay, if it has only been seen on EPEL then no need to look further. IIRC it got fixed in RHEL 5 too, 5.3 or thereabouts. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
