On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 06:43:35PM +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote: > Note that rpm < 4.6.0 did behave differently here: packages with > conflicting files were allowed to be installed in the same transaction but > not if installed separately, leading to strange situations. So if there's > a chance you've tested on RHEL/Centos at some point, that could explain it > as it'd then be just a matter of which order the packages got installed > in. That could well explain why we've only seen this reported on EPEL 5. I thought it was a coincidence, but looks like it could be the older RPM version there. Rich. -- Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones New in Fedora 11: Fedora Windows cross-compiler. Compile Windows programs, test, and build Windows installers. Over 70 libraries supprt'd http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/MinGW http://www.annexia.org/fedora_mingw -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
