I'm currently packaging lessfs and there are apparently a couple libraries that are a part of it that have become a cause for concern by the reviewer (rightfully so) and I'm hoping someone could offer a recommendation of how to go about packaging them. Review Request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=530473 Latest spec (not yet submitted to the review): http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs.spec Latest SRPM (not yet submitted to the review): http://maxamillion.fedorapeople.org/lessfs-1.0.0-1.fc12.src.rpm There is one library that will have to be a separate package, QuickLZ which I plan to package up and put in for review but there are many other lib_$foo.c files that belong to lessfs and are original work by the author. Upstream has been extremely responsive and very helpful through out this process and is willing to work along with me to get some changes into the upstream release but I'm just trying to find the best solution. Here is where the recommendations would be helpful: Should I package the source and not worry about packaging the libraries? Should the libraries be in their own sub package? Should each library be their own package? or $other? Many thanks to all, -AdamM -- http://maxamillion.googlepages.com --------------------------------------------------------- () ascii ribbon campaign - against html e-mail /\ www.asciiribbon.org - against proprietary attachments -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
