Re: Our static Libraries packaging guidelines once more

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 01/05/2010 11:30 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Tue, 2010-01-05 at 11:03 -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
On the other hand, with the
guideline being so widely ignored, I'm not in a hurry to do work to
comply with it ...
Isn't that a chicken/egg problem?

It really is. I mean, we could create the "Packaging Police" to run
around and enforce the guidelines by force (either by fixing them
manually, or by threatening maintainers until they do it), but is that
really what we want?

~spot

No.  Too bad though, I had visions of spiffy new uniforms.

That aside, I'd love to have all packages in total Guidlines compliance.

I'd also love to be rich.  And thinner.

-J

--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love

-d. bowie

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux