On Mon, 04 Jan 2010 16:40:35 +0100, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > On 01/02/2010 09:32 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > >Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only copies the > >needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT people. > > What happens if the software version N crashes, then the updates > install a later version, and the ABRT tool is run afterwards? With > updates coming fast and furious, this is not uncommon, and I think > it leads to confusion when the old stack trace is interpreted > against the debugging info from the different software version. Unaware of the ABRT issue; But even with the installed debuginfo packages the problem exists: `yum update' gets the installed debuginfos out of sync https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432806 There are various Bugs referenced, such as: Debug info RPMs do not "require" exact maching binary rpm https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=151598 Currently YUM at least updates both the main package and its debuginfo through yum-plugin-auto-update-debug-info. The problem is with all the mirrors and daily Fedora updates the main repository and the debuginfo repository are commonly off-by-one and thus the debuginfo packages still do not match. Regards, Jan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
