Re: ABRT considered painful

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3.1.2010 13:37, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
On 01/02/2010 03:32 PM, Jan Kratochvil wrote:
On Sat, 02 Jan 2010 13:39:07 +0100, Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus wrote:
When the debuginfo package of a particular binary is
installed, then the symbols are loaded whenever the binary is loaded or
are the symbols only considered by tools like gdb and so on?

The latter.

Moreover ABRT does not install the whole debuginfo package but only
copies the
needed specific .debug files out of it somewhere - as know the ABRT
people.


Jan


Exactly, we don't install it, just extract the package to
/var/cache/abrt-di. ABRT doesn't remove it automatically, but it's a
planned feature.

If you will indeed implement this, please let the users choose whether they want the .debug files (or whatever you extract) to be removed or kept forever. I'm really happy with the current situation and do not want to wait until ABRT downloads the debuginfo packages every time again.

Thanks,
Milos

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux