Hi, > > You can't expect everyone to change their software design to work > for > > Fedora, even if it has disadvantages. > > We do expect that, sorry. Bundling libraries is not a solution, fixing > the library not to break its ABI/API every couple days is. Here I have to agree with you Kevin. Mono.Cecil is a pain, but it's the only one in Mono which does change between packages. I don't understand why. As it stands, the fix was easy; change monodevelop so that it doesn't add mono.cecil to the list that it provides and add it in by itself. It's not a fix upstream will listen to (as aren't the 64 bit lib fixes - don't ask, I've been trying for ages to get them to accept them). I'm going to have a go at building the other monodevelop plugins over the next week and get them into rawhide.... Assuming I still can by then ;-p TTFN Paul -- Sie können mich aufreizen und wirklich heiß machen!
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
