On 12/24/2009 04:15 AM, Alex Lancaster wrote: >>>>>> Alex Lancaster writes: > >>>>>> Rawhide Report writes: >> So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages) >> for ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is >> anybody actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these packages? >> If not, please let us know so a provenpackager can fix these, they >> overwhelm the rawhide log and make it more likely that people ignore >> the entire broken dep log. It seems like it is only a version number >> in a subpackage that needs building or somesuch, so hopefully it is >> trivial to fix. > > Hmm, this is odd, I noticed that according to: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20091223/logs/repodiff > > abiword was successfully rebuilt: Abiword situation is explained at https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-test-list/2009-December/msg00357.html Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
