>>>>> Alex Lancaster writes: >>>>> Rawhide Report writes: > So these huge slew of broken deps (seems like more than 10 packages) > for ghc have been in the rawhide reports for over a week now, is > anybody actively maintaining and/or planning to fix these packages? > If not, please let us know so a provenpackager can fix these, they > overwhelm the rawhide log and make it more likely that people ignore > the entire broken dep log. It seems like it is only a version number > in a subpackage that needs building or somesuch, so hopefully it is > trivial to fix. Hmm, this is odd, I noticed that according to: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20091223/logs/repodiff abiword was successfully rebuilt: abiword-2.8.1-3.fc13 -------------------- * Mon Dec 21 2009 Peter Robinson <pbrobinson@xxxxxxxxx> - 1:2.8.1-3 - Rebuild against new libwv but the depcheck shows it still broken: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/mash/rawhide-20091223/logs/depcheck 1:abiword-2.8.1-3.fc13.i686 requires libwv-1.2.so.4 Similarly it looks like parts of ghc were rebuilt: ghc-X11-1.5.0.0-1.fc13 ---------------------- * Mon Dec 21 2009 Yaakov M. Nemoy <ynemoy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 1.5.0.0-1 - updated to latest upstream - updates spec to use shared libraries and new ghc Is there something perhaps wrong with the dep check script? Alex -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
