Re: Possible wrong versions tagged into f12-final

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2009/12/16 Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx>:
> On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:19 +0000, Quentin Armitage wrote:
>> I've noticed what might be a couple of anomalies regarding which
>> versions of packages have been tagged into f12-final.
>>
>> freenx-client: 0.9-9.fc12 was built as part of the dist-f12-rebuild, but
>> 0.9-10.fc11 tagged has been tagged into f12-final.
>>
>> gauche: 0.8.14.3.fc12 was built during the mass F12 rebuild, but
>> 0.8.14.3.fc11 has been tagged into f12-final. It appears that
>> 0.8.14-2.fc12 was built after 0.8.14-3.fc12 (during the mass F12
>> rebuild).
>>
>> Quentin Armitage
>>
>>
>
> Yeah, looks like some fallout around the mass rebuild and getting things
> tagged over.  Too late to do anything about F12 now, owners of those
> packages might consider issuing updates (which would then be picked up
> in F13)

Bug #548216 filed for freenx-client
Bug #548218 filed for gauche

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux