Re: Possible wrong versions tagged into f12-final

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, 2009-11-09 at 11:19 +0000, Quentin Armitage wrote:
> I've noticed what might be a couple of anomalies regarding which
> versions of packages have been tagged into f12-final.  
> 
> freenx-client: 0.9-9.fc12 was built as part of the dist-f12-rebuild, but
> 0.9-10.fc11 tagged has been tagged into f12-final.
> 
> gauche: 0.8.14.3.fc12 was built during the mass F12 rebuild, but
> 0.8.14.3.fc11 has been tagged into f12-final. It appears that
> 0.8.14-2.fc12 was built after 0.8.14-3.fc12 (during the mass F12
> rebuild).
> 
> Quentin Armitage
> 
> 

Yeah, looks like some fallout around the mass rebuild and getting things
tagged over.  Too late to do anything about F12 now, owners of those
packages might consider issuing updates (which would then be picked up
in F13)

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux