On Wed, 2009-12-09 at 12:38 -0900, Jeff Spaleta wrote: > On Wed, Dec 9, 2009 at 12:26 PM, Paul W. Frields <stickster@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Jef, I'll help with istanbul. If anyone else out there is considering > > doing so, please feel free to team up with me. > > Other than revelation(which essentially has a dead > upstream)...Istanbul is probably the most in need of more development > love. This made me prick up my ears, as I keep my entire gigantic password database in revelation. What kind of development does it actually need? Dead upstream or not, it seems to work fine. Is it in imminent danger of dying? I can't help, not being a coder, but I'd like to know what's going on in case I have to change my workflow :/ -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
