On Thu, Dec 10, 2009 at 4:24 PM, Stephen John Smoogen <smooge@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Its dead upstream? Oh dear. I use it quite a bit so probably need to > look it over then. I use it too. A lot of people use it. I poked upstream prior to F11 and the developer responded saying he was getting back to it soon but I haven't seen much activity. Up to this point I've tried to at least tell the Ubuntu maintainer about any patches I add since its not clear how to submit patches to upstream. What I'd like to do is get the different distro maintainers together as a group form a game plan on setting up a new dvcs trunk for the project and then politely tell the existing upstream we want to move ahead with his blessing and have him as a contributor. It's an aging codebase and it needs to transition to using the newer gvfs stuff versus the older gnomevfs stuff... at a minimum. I don't want to do that as a set of downstream patches in Fedora. And until I get back from the other side of the world I can't commit to being a new upstream....sadly. If you want to get that conversation started...you have my blessing. -jef -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
