Matěj Cepl (mcepl@xxxxxxxxxx) said: > Moreover, I don't know what's your problem with radeonhd driver in > Fedora. Hanz does IMHO excellent job on maintaining it and it > doesn't drag much additional resources on anybody (except on me, > perhaps, because I triage bugs for him as well, which is the reason > that this time I even a little know what I am talking about ;)). And > of course comparing -radeonhd bugs (http://is.gd/59Hc0) with -ati > bugs (http://is.gd/59Hp0) is unfair, because there are many more > users of -ati driver, but at least it shows that radeonhd is really > not burning issue. > > What's the problem? Does not work at all with KMS, which is on by default; is unsupported by the people that maintain the servers and the rest of the drivers. Following a sane OAOO strategy, we'll get better results if we try and get all fixes on a single driver path moving forwards. Bill -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
