On 12/01/2009 09:35 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > So, if our X maintainers won't handle bugs with it, we have a working > default alternative that is maintained upstream, and it's *known* to > be broken in the default configuration, why ship it? If we're trying to > focus on quality, I'm not sure why we'd ship something that's known > broken. Because the alternative may be more broken for some people? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495688 -- ======================================================================== Ian Pilcher arequipeno@xxxxxxxxx ======================================================================== -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
