Re: Build Failure regarding Boost

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Dec 1, 2009 at 6:53 PM, Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the
> potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs
> the ability to specify a Boost library suffix.  It sounds like your
> package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required
> suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix.
>
> If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most
> expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on.  But an upstream-worthy
> patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix.  Also, -mt is a
> saner default than no suffix at all.

The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake
which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the
Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions?

       Tim

--
   Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>      www.niemueller.de
=================================================================
 Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein)

--


Perhaps CMake needs to be updated to 2.8.0 final? I think there was a FindBoost.cmake update in 2.8.0...
-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux