On 01.12.2009 19:15, Braden McDaniel wrote: > Broadly speaking (beyond just Fedora), there's enough variability in the > potential names of Boost libraries that a package's configuration needs > the ability to specify a Boost library suffix. It sounds like your > package's configuration is trying to be clever and divine the required > suffix--and it's failing and falling back to no suffix. > > If your package's configuration won't let you specify a suffix, the most > expedient thing to do may be just to hack it on. But an upstream-worthy > patch would add a means to specify an arbitrary suffix. Also, -mt is a > saner default than no suffix at all. The suffix is determined in /usr/share/cmake/Modules/FindBoost.cmake which is part of cmake, so there is nothing I can do about this in the Player package. Could this be a problem with new cmake or boost versions? Tim -- Tim Niemueller <tim@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> www.niemueller.de ================================================================= Imagination is more important than knowledge. (Albert Einstein) -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list