On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 20:20 -0600, Mike McGrath wrote: > > 5) The people who want this new security policy should add an opt-in checkbox > > in Anaconda or firstboot. > Does anyone disagree with anything in 1-5? It all sounds reasonable to > me? I disagree with 5, that's not a sensible or sustainable way to deal with this kind of thing. At least not without some kind of coherent process. Just throwing in single-issue checkboxes ad hoc is not the way to do this - should we have fifty checkboxes for everything you can configure users to be able to do or not able to do? If we're going to go down that route, it needs to be a properly planned utility, something like Mandriva's msec. Only, uh, probably better. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
