On Thu, 2009-11-19 at 04:48 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > On 11/19/2009 04:31 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:37 +0100, Michael Schwendt wrote: > >> If there were an automated sanity check somewhere as part of the pkg > >> release procedure, that might help. It would enforce proper %release > >> bumps. > >> > >> > > > > That is coming with AutoQA and it will certainly be able to find > > upgrade-path issues. > > A lot of questions seem to be getting this answer but how close are we > to AutoQA doing all this? Are we going to start running it and reporting > bugs in Rawhide soon? There's a weekly update on AutoQA in the QA group meetings, the summaries and logs of which you can find linked here: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA/Meetings I also summarize the weekly update in the QA section in every FWN issue. I'm not working on autoqa myself, but we're actually already running several autoqa tests - the results go to the autoqa-results mailing list at present, https://fedorahosted.org/mailman/listinfo/autoqa-results , until we have things in more 'final' form - and I would guess we will be running tests of the kind discussed above, oh, during the F13 cycle. Will could be more precise. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
