Re: Review request...

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:50 -0200, Itamar wrote:
>
>> may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time.
>
> True, but an entire day is not needed. And nobody forces you to become a
> reviewer [or a sponsor] and spend any time at all on reviewing or guiding
> [new] packagers. The community of Fedora Packagers can only work fine if
> everybody stays polite and calm even during disagreement [or
> misunderstandings and foreign language barriers].
>
>> I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file.
>
> Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for
> relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important
> during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries
> even in Fedora cvs.
>

I agree, for me it's very important to post updated spec file +
src.rpm with or without changelog bumped




------------

Itamar Reis Peixoto

e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
skype: itamarjp
icq: 81053601
+55 11 4063 5033
+55 34 3221 8599

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux