On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 1:43 PM, Michael Schwendt <mschwendt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 18 Nov 2009 12:44:50 -0200, Itamar wrote: > >> may be, but sponsors or reviewers doesn't have entire day free time. > > True, but an entire day is not needed. And nobody forces you to become a > reviewer [or a sponsor] and spend any time at all on reviewing or guiding > [new] packagers. The community of Fedora Packagers can only work fine if > everybody stays polite and calm even during disagreement [or > misunderstandings and foreign language barriers]. > >> I have only asked reporter to post spec file + src.rpm file. > > Many packagers don't know that maintaining a proper spec %changelog for > relevant spec file changes and %release bumps are considered important > during review already. Others add meaningless/dummy %changelog entries > even in Fedora cvs. > I agree, for me it's very important to post updated spec file + src.rpm with or without changelog bumped ------------ Itamar Reis Peixoto e-mail/msn/google talk/sip: itamar@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx skype: itamarjp icq: 81053601 +55 11 4063 5033 +55 34 3221 8599 -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
