On Nov 17, 2009, at 14:47, Conrad Meyer <cemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote:
On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning
regarding
broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps
were
broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer
producing
ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config
change
that enacted this on our compose tools. We were attempting to
compose
ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't
work so
hot.
We should have this fixed today so that future emails about broken
deps
will be about actual broken deps, not broken configurations.
Sorry for
the mailbombing.
*sigh*
While we were successful in building a new mash package that would
avoid
making ppc repos, we forgot to update one of the rawhide creation
configs so that it used dist-f13 content as opposed to dist-f12.
So the
rawhide creation process has been using dist-f12 content all this
time
to build up the chroot, which would then compose dist-f13 content.
This
means that the dist-f12 version of mash was used, not the dist-f13
version we built to disable ppc.
I've corrected that. Third try to kill the ppc deps should be the
charm.
Could we just not send emails tomorrow, double check that it
produces the
correct result, and re-enable them for the next day? In case there's
something
else we-shouldn't-have-missed-but-we-did?
That's one of the changes I made today.
--
Jes
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
