On Tuesday 17 November 2009 06:50:58 am Jesse Keating wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-16 at 11:22 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding > > broken deps in rawhide. If these emails mentioned that the deps were > > broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored. We are no longer producing > > ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config change > > that enacted this on our compose tools. We were attempting to compose > > ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't work so > > hot. > > > > We should have this fixed today so that future emails about broken deps > > will be about actual broken deps, not broken configurations. Sorry for > > the mailbombing. > > *sigh* > > While we were successful in building a new mash package that would avoid > making ppc repos, we forgot to update one of the rawhide creation > configs so that it used dist-f13 content as opposed to dist-f12. So the > rawhide creation process has been using dist-f12 content all this time > to build up the chroot, which would then compose dist-f13 content. This > means that the dist-f12 version of mash was used, not the dist-f13 > version we built to disable ppc. > > I've corrected that. Third try to kill the ppc deps should be the > charm. Could we just not send emails tomorrow, double check that it produces the correct result, and re-enable them for the next day? In case there's something else we-shouldn't-have-missed-but-we-did? -- Conrad Meyer <cemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
