Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-11-10 at 00:01 +0100, Björn Persson wrote: > > I don't see that I as a packager can do anything to prevent these > > conflicts. Shall I conclude that I don't need to care about conflicts > > between architecture versions of debuginfo packages? Or shall I try to > > avoid conflicts in debuginfo packages for libraries, but not for > > programs? I think I can avoid debuginfo conflicts in packages that > > provide only libraries, but maybe I shouldn't bother? > > debuginfo packages cannot be multilib, that is why we don't offer them > multilib. I'm guessing that "we don't offer them multilib" means that 32-bit debuginfo packages aren't meant to be installed on 64-bit systems, so I'll take this to mean that I shouldn't bother doing anything to avoid conflicts. Björn Persson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
