Are conflicts in debuginfo packages OK?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello, could someone help me understand the rules about file conflicts and 
debuginfo packages?

I thought there was a rule that if the 32-bit and 64-bit versions of a package 
provide the same file, then the file's contents must be identical in both 
packages, with an exception for binary executable files in standard locations 
like /usr/bin. Now I've noticed that lots of debuginfo packages seem to be 
violating this rule. The debuginfo packages put files in /usr/lib/debug/usr/bin 
and similar directories, and the exception doesn't seem to apply to these 
directories, because RPM complains about conflicts when I try to install both 
architecture versions of a debuginfo package.

I don't see that I as a packager can do anything to prevent these conflicts. 
Shall I conclude that I don't need to care about conflicts between architecture 
versions of debuginfo packages? Or shall I try to avoid conflicts in debuginfo 
packages for libraries, but not for programs? I think I can avoid debuginfo 
conflicts in packages that provide only libraries, but maybe I shouldn't 
bother?

Björn Persson

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux