On Sun, 2009-11-08 at 14:34 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > why don't we make it official that we're the new-old-grub upstream and > > give it a shiny new name and a website? it's not like we're not the > > upstream for half the rest of the stack, it'd hardly be a radical new > > venture... Well we do have a public git repo that consists of grub1 + our changes. Our grub package consists of the last upstream grub1 source + all our patches from our git repo on top of it. I think Peter has been working with other distros that are still on grub1. > > Wouldn't it be easier to work with GRUB2 folks to add the missing > features we need? > > In theory yes, that's how it's supposed to go. In practice, with grub, it doesn't work that way. From what I gather they just aren't interested in working on the things we need at this point in grub2's development. -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
