On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 12:58 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote: > > > > Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a > > piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This isn't > > a nice place to be in as a downstream. > > > > And yet grub2 still doesn't have all the things we need it to have, that > is in our grub, and seem to still not want our stuff yet. Also not a > great place to be as a downstream. why don't we make it official that we're the new-old-grub upstream and give it a shiny new name and a website? it's not like we're not the upstream for half the rest of the stack, it'd hardly be a radical new venture... -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
