On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 12:00 -0700, Jerry James wrote: > Those aren't the same. Since the addition of a new arch can break #2, > how can packagers mean anything other than #1 by "noarch"? They can't, but it was a historical assumption that if you indicate #1, you're implicitly indicating #2. This has proven to break down as of late, so we have to re-do the logic code around where a build can be done. It's no longer safe to assume that "noarch" means "anyarch". -- Jesse Keating Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature! identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
