On 11/04/2009 10:39 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Wed, 2009-11-04 at 17:20 +0000, Paul Howarth wrote:
So a noarch script package that depends on its arch script interpreter
(e.g. all python and perl packages) should be arch packages?
And bash for that matter.
This is a known problem with rpm/koji. The distinction between "noarch"
and "arch specific" is a difficult one to draw. We do have support in
our compose tools to look up an srpm and determine whether or not a
noarch rpm has Exclude/ExclusiveArch settings (since that data doesn't
propagate to the noarch rpm itself). What we don't have just yet is
code in koji to detect a noarch build that has Exclude/ExclusiveArch
settings and avoid sending said build to one of those arches.
So, I managed to do a build with:
BuildArch: noarch
ExcludeArch: ppc64
If that gets tagged, it will get excluded from the ppc64 repo?
--
Orion Poplawski
Technical Manager 303-415-9701 x222
NWRA/CoRA Division FAX: 303-415-9702
3380 Mitchell Lane orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Boulder, CO 80301 http://www.cora.nwra.com
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
