On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > > That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for > > this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2 > > might turn out to be useful for this code as well. > > > > > Now I would really like to promote a comprehensive understanding of that policy. > > > > It would be nice to have an example of how do the build for something like this > > in one spec file. > > The documentation there is is at > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags > > but it's not a lot. > We could definitely use a more comprehensive section that addresses the need to build the library twice, where to drop the resulting libs on the filesystem, and what flags are/are not supported by the linker. If someone would like to create a packaging draft for the packaging committee that wouldbe wonderful. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgp4OpIFetmTA.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list