Re: What to do with package that wants to use sse?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 09:33:13AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2009-10-31 at 09:29 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> 
> > That is very useful information. It sounds like I will want to do this for
> > this package, since enabling sse2 will turn on the sse instructions and sse2
> > might turn out to be useful for this code as well.
> > 
> > > Now I would really like to promote a comprehensive understanding of that policy.
> > 
> > It would be nice to have an example of how do the build for something like this
> > in one spec file.
> 
> The documentation there is is at
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Compiler_flags
> 
> but it's not a lot.
> 
We could definitely use a more comprehensive section that addresses the need
to build the library twice, where to drop the resulting libs on the
filesystem, and what flags are/are not supported by the linker.

If someone would like to create a packaging draft for the packaging
committee that wouldbe wonderful.

-Toshio

Attachment: pgp4OpIFetmTA.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux